W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Decent Hypermedia, and RDF vs. XML

From: Daniel \ <eikeon@eikeon.com>
Date: 05 Feb 2003 15:17:43 -0500
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Cc: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <1044476263.25014.1566.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:05, Sean B. Palmer wrote:

> I still think everything was done bass-ackwards. RDF should've come
> first, so that people could think about the semantics of their li'l
> projects, and then all the serializations and applications could
> follow.

I think reality is what mandates things, more often than not, to be done
in an bass-ackwards way. In an ideal world the order would have been
reversed most certainly.

We have RDF now and so let's all keep working to put it in its place.
It's never fun changing a foundation, but it's not impossible.

> Anyway, from one RDF zealot to another...

This RDF zealot waves and says: Let's keep building RDF data, tools, and
applications that interoperate with the existing web -- and watch the
order be restored :)

-- 
Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/

Redfoot.net, http://redfoot.net/
RDFLib.net, http://rdflib.net/
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 15:17:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:26 GMT