Sean B. Palmer wrote: >>I plan to use it so I never have to write HTML again. It >>should also be forward-compatible to whatever Advanced >>XHTML 5.0 idiocy the W3C comes up with >> >> > >Well, I can certainly support the general reasoning there, but... > >* Why not use an HTML WYSIWYG editor? Well, except for the fact that >there isn't a decent one in existence yet, that I know of. Sigh: it'd >be such a timesaver for me (and seemingly you, too) if someone came up >with a decent HTML editor. > Why not indeed. Incidentally , what *is* the best WYSIWYG editor out there at the moment. I use Mozilla composer, but it doesn't do CSS (that i know of)... nore does it allow for RDF descriptions (that i know of). >>Here's the master plan: >> >> atx for documents >> I think atx is cool but I think that every author would want to customize it for themselves. >>+ rdf (n3) for data >> I prefer to write RDF in Semenglish . >>= no more XML! (bwahaha) >> I'll drink to that ! Hey .. Aaron, Sean and Me all in one email ... just like old times :) Seth Russell http://radio.weblogs.com/0113759/Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 14:09:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:50 GMT