W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2003

Spec feedback

From: Gervase Markham <gerv@gerv.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:43:11 +0000
Message-ID: <3FE04F5F.1060000@gerv.net>
To: htmlforms@damowmow.com
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

A few comments on http://www.hixie.ch/specs/html/forms/web-forms . 
Apologies for not having time to study the draft in more depth.

- 2.1. expdate. Is there a less application-specific name for this type 
that could be used?

- Do the new types mean that extensions to RFC3106 might be useful? Is 
it the job of your spec to specify them?

- "The entire model can be emulated purely using JavaScript and the DOM. 
With such a library, this model could be used and down-level clients 
could be supported before user agents implemented it ubiquitously. 
Creating such a library is left as an exercise to the reader."

This begs the question: why not write and publish the library instead of 
writing a spec?

Gerv
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 07:42:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:37 GMT