- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:19:24 -0700
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "W3C Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
From an editorial POW, I am fine with this reformulation and if we all think this is within the realm of editorial discretion then we should just do it. >"SOAP messages sent by initial SOAP senders MUST NOT contain >processing instruction information items. SOAP intermediaries >MUST NOT insert >processing instruction information items in SOAP messages they >relay. SOAP receivers receiving a SOAP message containing a >processing instruction information item SHOULD generate a SOAP >fault with the Value of Code set to "env:Sender". However, in >the case where performance considerations make it impractical >for an intermediary to detect processing instruction >information items in a message to be relayed, such >intermediaries MAY leave the processing instruction >information items unchanged in the relayed message." Henrik
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 12:19:57 UTC