Ok... what about adding the following sentence (*quoted*): "MUST clearly and completely specify the content and semantics of the header blocks used to implement the behavior in question, including if appropriate any modifications to the SOAP Processing model. *The SOAP Processing Model may be changed in arbitrary ways.*" We might wish to add a safety warning. What do you think? Jean-Jacques. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > Thanks... Would description of examples of what one can do with features > be primer stuff? > > Henrik > > >>Here's a copy of my original message. Does it make sense? >> >>Jean-Jacques. >> >>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: >> >>>What's the issue with 280? Is it how we say that even though >> >>there are >> >>>practical limits we don't restrict the ways SOAP may be extended? >>> >>>Henrik >>> >>> >>> >>>>>Ok, I've done mine, except #280 for which I'm awaiting further >>>>>feedback. >>>> >>Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 09:18:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:44 GMT