W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue 221 resolution text change

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:08:02 +0200
Message-ID: <3D7CB952.1040909@crf.canon.fr>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, W3C Archive <www-archive@w3.org>

Sounds good, thanks!

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
 > In the case
> of a re-inserted header,  what about (at or near the sentence on 
> re-inserting indistinguishable headers) "intermediaries SHOULD NOT 
> reinsert headers that contained processing instructions but SHOULD 
> instead, as described above(below), fault with a sender fault."
> In other words, you MUST not insert new headers with PIs, you SHOULD NOT 
> reinsert headers that were received with PIs, (and as we've more or less 
> agreed) you SHOULD fault if you receive a message with a PI.  How's that?
Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 11:08:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:15 UTC