Sounds good, thanks! noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > In the case > of a re-inserted header, what about (at or near the sentence on > re-inserting indistinguishable headers) "intermediaries SHOULD NOT > reinsert headers that contained processing instructions but SHOULD > instead, as described above(below), fault with a sender fault." > > In other words, you MUST not insert new headers with PIs, you SHOULD NOT > reinsert headers that were received with PIs, (and as we've more or less > agreed) you SHOULD fault if you receive a message with a PI. How's that?Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 11:08:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:44 GMT