W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:53:55 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E026821A9@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
I agree this is a comment on the spec in general. It is also a dupe ( of
Issue 277[2] )
 
Gudge
 
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x277

-----Original Message-----
From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) [mailto:Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se] 
Sent: 03 September 2002 20:36
To: Nilo Mitra (EUS); 'Jean-Jacques Moreau'; Martin Gudgin; 'Marc
Hadley'; 'Noah Mendelson'; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Cc: 'W3C Public Archive'
Subject: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?



Gentlemen: 
Might perhaps LC issue 309 [1] be a more general matter, and misdirected
at Part0: Primer by mistake? (The remainder of the originator's comments
are on the Primer, from which this one is an excerpt.)

Please clarify, 
Thanks 
Nilo 
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x309 
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 15:56:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:22 GMT