RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16

>I've implemented your suggested change s/header/header field/. 
>Actually, I've swept through the entire spec (part 2) and 
>repeated the change where appropriate. (BTW, RFC 2616 is 
>inconsistent in its use of header vs. header field.)

Yes, it took a long time to get the terminology down for this
distinction in HTTP :(

>I have also fixed replaced [SOAP MediaType] with a reference to 
>appendix A, since the IETF draft is now an empty shell and its 
>content was moved to this appendix.

Good idea

>+1 to your other proposals.

Thanks!

Henrik