W3C

Editors version of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)

Editors version of W3C Working Draft XX Month 2002

This version:
http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/
$Revision: 1.350 $
Latest W3C version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20020325
CVS history
Editor:
Dave Beckett (University of Bristol)
Series Editor:
Brian McBride (Hewlett Packard Labs)

Abstract

This specification defines an XML syntax for the Resource Description Framework (RDF) as amended and clarified by the RDF Core Working Group from that originally described in RDF Model & Syntax. The syntax is updated to be specified in terms of XML, XML Namespaces, the XML Information Set with new support for XML Base. For each part of the RDF/XML syntax, it gives an example of how it works and in grammar defines actions for generating the triples that form the RDF graph as defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Working Draft. This is done using the N-Triples graph serializing test format which enables more precise recording of the mapping in a machine processable and testable form. These tests are gathered and published in the RDF Test Cases Working Draft.

Status of this Document

This is the editors version of a W3C RDF Core Working Group Working Draft produced as part of the W3C Semantic Web Activity (Activity Statement). It incorporates decisions made by the Working Group updating the XML syntax for RDF from the original RDF Model & Syntax [RDF-MS] document in terms of the XML Information Set [INFOSET]. including new support for XML Base, RDF datatyping, rdf:nodeID for referencing blank nodes and rdf:parseType="Collection" for expressing a closed collection of nodes.

This document is being released for review by W3C Members and other interested parties to encourage feedback and comments, especially with regard to how the changes affect existing implementations and content. The current state is that it represents all the syntax as described in the grammar section of the original document, with some removed parts (see rdfms-abouteach), and the mapping to the RDF graph is considered complete. The detailed changes from the previous 25 March 2002 draft are described in the Changes section however the main changes are as follows: Section 2 An XML syntax for RDF expanded with many more examples covering all of the syntax, support for RDF datatyped literals using rdf:datatype was added, rdf:nodeID was added to allow referencing of blank nodes, rdf:parseType="Collection" was added for creating closed collections of nodes and many other more minor changes after RDF Core Working Group decisions made since the last draft.

This is a public W3C Working Draft and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite as other than "work in progress". A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

There are no known patent or IPR constraints associated with this Working Draft. The RDF Core Working Group Patent Disclosure page contains details, in conformance with W3C policy requirements.

Comments on this document are invited and should be sent to the public mailing list www-rdf-comments@w3.org. An archive of comments is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/.

Table of contents

1 Introduction
2 An XML syntax for RDF
  2.1 Introduction
  2.2 Node Elements and Property Elements
  2.3 Multiple Property Elements
  2.4 Empty Property Elements
  2.5 Property Attributes
  2.6 Completing the Document - Document Element and XML Declaration
  2.7 Languages - xml:lang
  2.8 XML Literals - rdf:parseType="Literal"
  2.9 Datatyped Literals - rdf:datatype
  2.10 Identifying Blank Nodes - rdf:nodeID
  2.11 Omitting Blank Nodes - rdf:parseType="Resource"
  2.12 Omitting Blank Nodes - Property Attributes on an empty Property Element
  2.13 Typed Nodes
  2.14 Abbreviating URIs - rdf:ID and xml:base
  2.15 List elements - rdf:li and rdf:_n
  2.16 Closed Collections - rdf:parseType="Collection"
  2.17 Reifying Statements - rdf:bagID and rdf:ID
  2.18 More Information
3 Terminology
4 RDF MIME type, file extension and Macintosh file type
5 Global Issues
  5.1 The RDF Namespace
  5.2 Identifiers
  5.3 Base URIs
  5.4 Constraints
6 Syntax Data Model
  6.1 Events
  6.2 Information Set Mapping
  6.3 Grammar Notation
7 RDF/XML Grammar
  7.1 Grammar Summary
  7.2 Grammar Productions
  7.3 Reification Rules
  7.4 List Expansion Rules
  7.5 Bag Expansion Rules
8 Serializing an RDF Graph to RDF/XML
9 RDF/XML in HTML
10 Acknowledgments
11 References

Appendices

A Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax (Non-Normative)
  A.1 Document Issues / Tasks (Non-Normative)
  A.2 RDF Core Working Group Open Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax (Non-Normative)
  A.3 RDF Core Working Group Decided Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax (Non-Normative)
  A.4 RDF Core Working Group Postponed Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax (Non-Normative)
B Syntax Schemas (Non-Normative)
  B.1 RELAX NG Compact Syntax Schema (Non-Normative)
  B.2 Other Syntax Schemas (Non-Normative)
C Changes (Non-Normative)


1 Introduction

This document describes the XML [XML] syntax for RDF as originally defined in the RDF Model & Syntax [RDF-MS] W3C Recommendation. Subsequent implementations of this syntax and comparison of the resulting RDF graphs have shown that there was ambiguity - implementations generated different graphs and certain syntax forms were not widely implemented. These issues were generally made as either feedback to the www-rdf-comments@w3.org (archive) or from discussions on the RDF Interest Group list www-rdf-interest@w3.org (archive) .

The RDF Core Working Group is chartered to respond to the need for a number of fixes, clarifications and improvements to the specification of RDF's abstract graph and XML syntax. The Working Group invites feedback from the developer community on the effects of its proposals on existing implementations and documents.

Several decisions including amendments and deletions to the grammar are referred to below. The definitive record of the decisions is the RDF Core Working Group issues list.

This document revises the original RDF/XML grammar in terms of XML Information Set [INFOSET] Information Items which moves away from the rather low-level details of XML, such as particular forms of empty elements. This allows the grammar to be more precisely recorded and the mapping from the XML syntax to the RDF graph more clearly shown. The mapping to the RDF graph is done by emitting statements in the form defined in the N-Triples section of RDF Test Cases [RDF-TESTS] Working Draft which creates an RDF graph, that has semantics defined by RDF Model Theory [RDF-MODEL] Working Draft.

The complete specification of RDF consists of a number of documents:

2 An XML syntax for RDF

2.1 Introduction

The RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model [RDF-CONCEPTS] defines the RDF Graph data model (Section 2.4.1) and the RDF Graph syntax (Section 3). Along with the RDF Model Theory [RDF-MODEL] this provides an abstract syntax with a formal semantics for it. This graph has nodes and labelled directed arcs. The nodes can be labeled with URIs, literals or are blank and denote resources. The arcs connect the nodes and are all labeled with URIs. This graph is more precisely called a directed edge-labeled graph; each edge is an arc with a direction (an arrow) connecting two nodes. These edges can be described as triples of subject node, at the blunt end of the arrow, property arc and an object node at the sharp end of the arrow/arc. The property arc can also be also interpreted as either a relationship between two resources or as defining an attribute value (object node) for some resource subject node.

In order to encode the graph in XML, the nodes and arcs have to be represented by XML element names, attribute names, element content and attribute content. The URI labels for properties and object nodes are written in XML via XML Namespaces [XML-NS] which allows a namespace URI to be given a short prefix that is used to namespace-qualify elements and attributes names with local names. RDF/XML uses (namespace URI, local name) pairs such that concatenating them forms the original URI that is required. This shortens the URIs used for property names. URIs labeling subject and object nodes are stored as XML attribute values. Nodes labeled by string literals (which are always object nodes) become element text content or attribute values.

A graph can be considered a sequence of paths of the form Node, Arc, Node, Arc, Node, Arc, ... which walk the entire graph. In RDF/XML these turn into sequences of elements inside elements which alternate between elements for Nodes and Arcs. This has been called a series of Node/Arc stripes. The Node at the start of the sequence turns into the outermost element, the next arc turns into a child element, and so on. The stripes generally start at the top of an RDF/XML document and always begin with nodes.

2.2 Node Elements and Property Elements

Graph for RDF/XML Example
Figure 1: Graph for RDF/XML Example (SVG version)

The sentence

There is a resource (this one) with a title, "RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)" and it has an editor, the editor has a name "Dave Beckett" and a home page http://purl.org/net/dajobe/.

can be written as the RDF graph in Figure 1 where the nodes are represented as ovals and contain their URI where they have them, the properties such as "has an editor" have been given URIs and these have been used to label the appropriate arc, and the strings have been written in rectangular nodes.

If we follow the Node, Arc ... path through the graph shown in Figure 2:

One Path Through the Graph
Figure 2: One Path Through the Graph (SVG version)

This corresponds to the Node/Arc stripes:

  1. Node [http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar]
  2. Arc -[http://example.org/stuff/1.0/editor]->
  3. Node []
  4. Arc -[http://example.org/stuff/1.0/homePage]->
  5. Node [http://purl.org/net/dajobe/]

In RDF/XML the sequence of 5 nodes and arcs for the arcs in Figure 2 corresponds to 5 XML elements shown in Example 1:

Example 1: Striped RDF/XML (nodes and arcs)
<rdf:Description>
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:homePage>
        <rdf:Description>
        </rdf:Description>
      </ex:homePage>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
</rdf:Description>

There are two types of XML elements in the striping in Example 1 corresponding to the nodes and arcs in the graph which are conventionally called Node Elements and Property Elements respectively. Here, rdf:Description is the node element (used 3 times for the three nodes) and ex:editor and ex:homePage are the 2 property elements.

The Figure 2 graph consists of some nodes labelled with URIs (others that remain blank) and this can be added to the RDF/XML using the rdf:about attribute on node elements to give the result in Example 2:

Example 2: Node Elements with URIs added
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:homePage>
        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/">
        </rdf:Description>
      </ex:homePage>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
</rdf:Description>

Adding the other two paths through the Figure 1 graph gives the result in Example 3:

Example 3: Complete description of all graph paths
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:homePage>
        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/">
        </rdf:Description>
      </ex:homePage>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:fullName>Dave Beckett</ex:fullName>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <dc:title>RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>

2.3 Multiple Property Elements

There are several abbreviations that can be used to make very common uses more easy to write down. In particular, it is very common that a resource is being described with multiple property / value pairs as in this example. The resource http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar has two arcs and the blank node resource also has two arcs.

This can be abbreviated by using multiple child property elements inside the node element describing the resource which then become properties of that node. This is shown in Example 4:

Example 4: Merging properties of the same resource node
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:homePage>
        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/">
        </rdf:Description>
      </ex:homePage>
      <ex:fullName>Dave Beckett</ex:fullName>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
  <dc:title>RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>

2.4 Empty Property Elements

When an arc points to a node with has no further arcs, which appears in RDF/XML as an empty node element sequence such as the pair <rdf:Description rdf:about="..."> </rdf:Description>, this form can be shortened. This is done by using the URI of the node as the value of an XML attribute rdf:resource on the containing property element and making the property element empty.

In this example, the property element ex:homePage contains an empty node element with the URI http://purl.org/net/dajobe/. This can be replaced with the empty property element form giving the result shown in Example 5:

Example 5: Empty property elements
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description>
      <ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/"/>
      <ex:fullName>Dave Beckett</ex:fullName>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
  <dc:title>RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>

2.5 Property Attributes

When a property's value is a literal string (not a resource) it can be encoded in a shorter form as an XML attribute and value of the node element. This can be done only if the property is not repeated, which is required by XML - attribute names are unique on an XML element. This abbreviation is known as a Property Attribute and can be applied to any node (or see below, rdf:parseType="Resource" form). This from can also be used (as a special case) when the property element is rdf:type, which always takes a resource node value.

In our example, there are two property elements with literal string values, the dc:title and ex:fullName property elements. These can be replaced with property attributes giving the result shown in Example 6:

Example 6: Replacing property elements with string values into property attributes
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"
                 dc:title="RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)">
  <ex:editor>
    <rdf:Description ex:fullName="Dave Beckett">
      <ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/"/>
    </rdf:Description>
  </ex:editor>
</rdf:Description>

2.6 Completing the Document - Document Element and XML Declaration

To create a complete RDF/XML document, the graph must be contained inside an rdf:RDF XML element which becomes the top-level XML document element. It is conventionally the element on which the XML namespaces that are used are defined, although that is not required. Additionally, the XML declaration should also be put at the top of the document with the XML version and possibly the XML content encoding (this is optional but recommended).

This could be done for any of the complete graph examples from Example 3 onwards but taking the smallest Example 6 and adding the final components, gives the complete RDF/XML representation of the original Figure 1 graph in Example 7:

Example 7: Complete RDF/XML description of graph (example07.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"
		   dc:title="RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)">
    <ex:editor>
      <rdf:Description ex:fullName="Dave Beckett">
	<ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/" />
      </rdf:Description>
    </ex:editor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.7 Languages - xml:lang

RDF/XML uses XML's xml:lang attribute as defined by 2.12 Language Identification of XML 1.0 [XML] to allow the identification of content language. This can be added to any XML element to indicate that the included content is in the given language. The most specific in-scope language present (if any) is applied to literal property element or property attribute values. The xml:lang="" form is used to indicate absence of language.

Some examples of marking content languages for RDF properties are shown in Example 8:

Example 8: Complete example of xml:lang (example08.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar">
    <dc:title>RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
    <dc:title xml:lang="en">RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
    <dc:title xml:lang="en-US">RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)</dc:title>
    <dc:description xml:lang="it">Il Pagio di Web Fuba</dc:description>
  </rdf:Description>

  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/buchen/baum" xml:lang="de">
    <dc:title>Das Baum</dc:title>
    <dc:description>Das Buch ist außergewöhnlich</dc:description>
    <dc:title xml:lang="en">The Tree</dc:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.8 XML Literals - rdf:parseType="Literal"

RDF allows XML Literals ([RDF-CONCEPTS] Section 3.2.2) to be given as the value of arcs. These are written in RDF/XML as content of a property element (not property attribute) and indicated using the rdf:parseType="Literal" attribute on the containing property element.

An example of writing an XML literal is given in Example 9 where there is a single RDF triple with the subject node labelled with URI http://example.org/thingy, the arc labelled with URI http://example.org/stuff/1.0/prop (from ex:prop) and the object node labelled with XML content beginning a:Collection

Example 9: Complete example of rdf:parseType="Literal" (example09.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/thingy">
    <ex:prop rdf:parseType="Literal" xmlns:a="http://example.org/a#">
       <a:Collection required="true">
         <a:widget size="10" />
         <a:grommit id="23" />
       </a:Collection>
    </ex:prop>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.9 Datatyped Literals - rdf:datatype

RDF allows Datatyped Literals to be given as the value of arcs. These consist of a literal string (with optional language) and a datatype URI. This is handled by using the same syntax syntax for literal string nodes in the property element form (not property attribute) but with an additional rdf:datatype="datatypeURI" attribute on the property element. Any URI can be used in the attribute.

Editors Note: I cannot yet point at Datatyped Literals in the latest published RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Working Draft.

An example of an RDF datatyped literal is given in Example 10 where there is a single RDF triple with the subject node labelled with URI http://example.org/thingy, the arc labelled with URI http://example.org/stuff/1.0/size (from ex:size) and the object node with the datatype ("123", http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int, no language) intending to be interpreted as a W3C XML Schema datatype int.

Example 10: Complete example of rdf:datatype (example10.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/thingy">
    <ex:size rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int">123</ex:size>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.10 Identifying Blank Nodes - rdf:nodeID

Blank nodes in the RDF graph are distinct but have no URI label. It is sometimes required that the same blank node is refered to in the serialization in multiple places, such as at the subject and object of several RDF triples. In this case, a Blank Node Identifier (or bnodeID) can be given to the blank node for identifying it in the document. This identifier does not exist outside a particular RDF/XML document or serialization. To use a bnodeID for a blank node, it can be used on a node element to replace rdf:about="URI" or on a property element to replace rdf:resource="URI".

Taking Example 7 and explicitly giving a bnodeID of abc to the blank node in it gives the result shown in Example 11. The second rdf:Description property element is about the blank node.

Example 11: Complete RDF/XML description of graph using rdf:nodeID labelling the blank node (example11.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"
		   dc:title="RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)">
    <ex:editor rdf:nodeID="abc"/>
  </rdf:Description>

  <rdf:Description rdf:nodeID="abc"
                   ex:fullName="Dave Beckett">
    <ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.11 Omitting Blank Nodes - rdf:parseType="Resource"

Blank nodes (no resource URI) appear often in RDF graphs and there is a an abbreviation that allows the extra <rdf:Description> </rdf:Description> pair to be omitted. This is done by putting an attribute on the containing property element rdf:parseType="Resource" that turns the property element into a property and node element, which can now have properties (property elements or property attributes). This causes the node-arc striping to be broken, which can make the resulting RDF/XML difficult to read.

Taking the earlier Example 7, the contents of the ex:editor property element could be alternatively done in this fashion to give the abbreviation shown in Example 12:

Example 12: Complete example using rdf:parseType="Resource" (example12.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"
		   dc:title="RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)">
    <ex:editor rdf:parseType="Resource">
      <ex:fullName>Dave Beckett</ex:fullName>
      <ex:homePage rdf:resource="http://purl.org/net/dajobe/"/>
    </ex:editor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.12 Omitting Blank Nodes - Property Attributes on an empty Property Element

If all the property elements on a blank node have string literal values (or at most one is rdf:type), these can be abbreviated by moving them to be property attributes on the containing property element which is made an empty element.

Taking the earlier Example 7, the contents of the ex:editor property element are two properties. Only one is suitable here for using in this form, so the ex:homePage property element is being ignored here. The abbreviated form where the ex:fullName property element moves to be a property attribute on the ex:editor property element, the blank node is implicit. The result is shown in Example 13.

Example 13: Complete example of property attributes on an empty property element (example13.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar"
		   dc:title="RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)">
    <ex:editor ex:fullName="Dave Beckett" />
    <!-- Note the ex:homePage property has been ignored for this example -->
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.13 Typed Nodes

It is very common for RDF graphs to have rdf:type arcs from nodes. These are conventionally called Typed Nodes and have a shorthand in RDF/XML to allow this to be expressed more consisely. This is done by replacing the rdf:Description node element name with the namespaced-element corresponding to the URI of the value of the type relationship. There may, of course, be multiple rdf:type arcs but only one can be used in this way, the others must remain as property elements or property attributes.

This form is also commonly used in RDF/XML with the built-in classes in The RDF Namespace: rdf:Seq, rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt, rdf:Statement, rdf:Property and rdf:List.

For example, the RDF/XML in Example 14 could be written as shown in Example 15.

Example 14: Complete example with rdf:type (example14.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/thing">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/Document"/>
    <dc:title>A marvelous thing</dc:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Example 15: Complete example using a Typed Node to replace an rdf:type (example15.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <ex:Document rdf:about="http://example.org/thing">
    <dc:title>A marvelous thing</dc:title>
  </ex:Document>
</rdf:RDF>

2.14 Abbreviating URIs - rdf:ID and xml:base

RDF/XML allows further abbreviating URIs in XML attributes in two ways. The XML Infoset provides a base URI attribute xml:base that sets the base URI for resolving relative URIs. This applies to all RDF attributes that deal with URIs which are rdf:about, rdf:resource and rdf:datatype.

The rdf:ID attribute on a node element (not property element, that has another meaning) can be used instead of rdf:about and gives a URI equivalent to # concatenated with the rdf:ID attribute value. So for example if rdf:ID="name", that would be equivalent to rdf:about="#name". This provides an additional check since the same name can only appear once in a single RDF/XML document, so is useful for defining a set of distinct, related terms relative to the same URI.

Example 16 shows abbreviating the node URI of http://example.org/here/#snack using an xml:base of http://example.org/here/ and an rdf:ID on the rdf:Description node element. The value of the ex:prop property element is also relative to the xml:base value, and the resulting URI is http://example.org/here/fruit/apple.

Example 16: Complete example using rdf:ID and xml:base for shortening URis (example16.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/"
         xml:base="http://example.org/here/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:ID="snack">
    <ex:prop rdf:resource="fruit/apple"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.15 List elements - rdf:li and rdf:_n

RDF has a set of list properties that are mostly used with the rdf:Seq, rdf:Bag and rdf:Alt classes, written as typed nodes typcially. The list properties are rdf:_1, rdf:_2 etc. and can be written out explicitly like that as property elements or attributes like in Example 17. There is a rdf:li special property element that can handle the counting automatically, turning into rdf:_1, rdf:_2 in order. The equivalent graph to Example 17 written in this form is shown in Example 18.

Example 17: Complexe example using RDF list properties (example17.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Seq rdf:about="http://example.org/favourite-fruit">
    <rdf:_1 rdf:resource="http://example.org/banana"/>
    <rdf:_2 rdf:resource="http://example.org/apple"/>
    <rdf:_3 rdf:resource="http://example.org/pear"/>
  </rdf:Seq>
</rdf:RDF>
Example 18: Complete example using rdf:li property element for list properties (example18.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
  <rdf:Seq rdf:about="http://example.org/favourite-fruit">
    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://example.org/banana"/>
    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://example.org/apple"/>
    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://example.org/pear"/>
  </rdf:Seq>
</rdf:RDF>

2.16 Closed Collections - rdf:parseType="Collection"

RDF/XML allows a closed set of nodes to be given as the value of a property by using the rdf:parseType="Collection" attribute on a property element. The value is the collection of nodes given inside. The exact graph generated is described in detail in Section 7.2.17 Production parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt.

Example 19 shows a collection of three nodes in a collection at the end of the ex:hasFruit property element.

Example 19: Complete example of a closed collection of nodes using rdf:parseType="Collection" (example19.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/basket">
    <ex:hasFruit rdf:parseType="Collection">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/banana"/>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/apple"/>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/pear"/>
    </ex:hasFruit>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.17 Reifying Statements - rdf:bagID and rdf:ID

The rdf:ID attribute can be used on a property element to reify the triple that it generates (See section 7.3 Reification Rules for the full details). The identifer for the triple is constructed as a relative URI of # concatenated with the rdf:ID attribute value. So for example if rdf:ID="triple", that would be equivalent to the URI #triple. Each such rdf:ID identifier has to be unique in the RDF/XML document (from the same set of identifiers as rdf:bagID).

Example 20 shows a rdf:ID being used to reify a triple made from the ex:prop property element giving the reified triple the URI http://example.org/triples/#triple1.

Example 20: Complete example of rdf:ID refiying a property element (example20.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/"
         xml:base="http://example.org/triples/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/">
    <ex:prop rdf:ID="triple1">blah</ex:prop>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

The rdf:bagID attribute can be used on a node element to give an identifier for a rdf:Bag that lists the statements generated by the property elements inside the node element. This allows statements to be made about that bag. The identifer is constructed as a relative URI of # concatenated with the rdf:bagID attribute value, like rdf:ID. So for example if rdf:bagID="bag", that would be equivalent to the URI #bag. Each such rdf:bagID identifier has to be unique in the RDF/XML document (from the same set of identifiers as rdf:ID).

Example 21 shows a rdf:Bag with URI http://example.org/bags/#bag1 being made of the triples from inside the rdf:Description node element.

Example 21: Complete example of rdf:bagID describing triples from a node element (example21.rdf)
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:ex="http://example.org/stuff/1.0/"
         xml:base="http://example.org/bags/">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/" rdf:bagID="bag1">
    <ex:prop1>blah</ex:prop1>
    <ex:prop2 rdf:resource="http://example.org/elsewhere/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

2.18 More Information

The RDF Core Working Group has developed an RDF Primer [RDF-PRIMER] that goes into detail introducing RDF and its applications.

For a longer introduction to the RDF/XML striped syntax with a historical perspective, see RDF: Understanding the Striped RDF/XML Syntax [STRIPEDRDF].

3 Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [KEYWORDS].

4 RDF MIME type, file extension and Macintosh file type

The Internet Media Type / MIME type for RDF is "application/rdf+xml" - see RFC 3032 (RFC-3023) section 8.18. The W3C will register this type when this working draft is more stable.

It is recommended that RDF files have the extension ".rdf" (all lowercase) on all platforms.

It is recommended that RDF files stored on Macintosh HFS file systems be given a file type of "rdf " (all lowercase, with a space character as the fourth letter).

5 Global Issues

5.1 The RDF Namespace

The RDF Namespace URI is http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# and is typically used in XML with the prefix rdf although other prefix strings may be used. The namespace contains the following names only:

Syntax names (no concepts in the graph)

RDF Description ID about bagID parseType resource li

RDF Classes in the graph

Seq Bag Alt Statement Property List

RDF Properties in the graph

subject predicate object type value first rest _n
where n is a non-negative integer.

RDF Resources in the graph

nil

Any other names are not defined and SHOULD generate a warning when encountered in an application, but should otherwise behave normally, and treated as properties and/or classes as appropriate for their use.

Throughout this document the terminology rdf:name will be used to indicate name is from the RDF namespace and it has a URI of the concatenation of the ·RDF Namespace URI· and name. For example, rdf:type has the URI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type

Note: In the 18 December 2001 Working Draft the names aboutEach and aboutEachPrefix were removed from the language and the RDF namespace by the RDF Core Working Group. See the resolution of issues rdfms-abouteach and rdfms-abouteachprefix for further information.

Note: In this version of the working draft, the names List, first, rest and nil were added to the RDF namespace by the RDF Core Working Group. See the resolution of issues rdfms-seq-representation for further information. Group).

Note: The Working Group invites feedback from the community on the effects of the removals and additions of these terms on existing implementations and documents and on the costs and benefits of adopting a new namespace URI to reflect this change (currently not proposed by the Working Group).

5.2 Identifiers

The RDF graph (RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Section 3) uses three types of identifiers (or labels) for nodes and arcs:

URI references (labeling nodes and arcs)

URI references (RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Section 3.1) can be either given as absolute URIs, relative URIs that have to be resolved to the in-scope base URI as described in section section 5.3, constructed from XML Namespace-qualified element and attributes names (QNames) or from rdf:ID and rdf:bagID attribute values.

XML QNames give URIs by concatenating the namespace URI and the XML local name. For example, if the XML Namespace prefix foo has URI http://example.org/somewhere/ then the QName foo:bar would correspond to the URI http://example.org/somewhere/bar. Note that this restricts which URIs can be made and the same URI can be given in multiple ways.

The rdf:ID and rdf:bagID values generate URIs by considering them as equivalent to the relative URI "#" concatenated with the attribute value. This can then be resolved relative to the in-scope base URI as described in section section 5.3.

Literals (labeling object nodes)

RDF Literals (RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model 3.2) are either Strings Literals (ibid 3.2.1), XML Literals (ibid 3.2.2) or Datatype Literals

Editors Note: I cannot yet point at Datatyped Literals in the latest published RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model Working Draft.

Blank node Identifiers (labeling nodes)
These are given local identifiers in the N-Triples serialization which MUST match the name production in N-Triples.

Note: In the past, some RDF applications have handled these nodes (then called anonymous nodes) by generating arbitrary URIs. This generates a different RDF graph. See also the Skolemization section of the RDF Model Theory [RDF-MODEL] Working Draft.

5.3 Base URIs

RDF/XML supports XML Base [XML-BASE] by being specified in terms of the XML Information Set [INFOSET]. This defines a ·base-uri· accessor for each ·root event· and ·element event·.

RDF/XML uses URI-references throughout and applies the in-scope Base URI to resolve both same document references of the forms "#frag" and "".

Test: Indicated by test001.rdf and test001.nt

Test: Indicated by test004.rdf and test004.nt

Test: Indicated by test008.rdf and test008.nt

Test: Indicated by test013.rdf and test013.nt

Test: Indicated by test016.rdf and test016.nt

An empty same document reference "" resolves against the URI part of the Base URI; any fragment part is ignored. See Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) [URIS] section 4.2

Test: Indicated by test013.rdf and test013.nt

Implementor Note: When using a hierarchical base URI that has no path component (/), it must be added before using as a base URI for resolving.

Test: Indicated by test011.rdf and test011.nt

5.4 Constraints

constraint-id

The names used as values of rdf:ID and rdf:bagID attributes must be unique in a single RDF/XML document since they come from the same set of names. This applies with respect to the in-scope ·base-uri· accessor of the current element; so the same value can appear on different elements in the same document but only if the in-scope base-uri values were different.

The syntax of the names must match the rdf-id production

Test: Indicated by test014.rdf and test014.nt

constraint-nodeID

The names used as values of rdf:nodeID come from a set of names that are independent of those of rdf:ID and rdf:bagID. The syntax of the names must match the rdf-id production

6 Syntax Data Model

This syntax is defined in terms of the XML Information Set represented as objects called Events in the style of the [XPATH]  Information Set Mapping. The order of the sequence is XML document order defined below in Section 6.2 Information Set Mapping. The sequence of events formed are intended to be similar to the sequence of events produced by the [SAX2] XML API from the same XML. These events are then mapped into the RDF Graph written as N-Triples.

This model is conceptual only and illustrates one way to create the N-Triples from the XML. It does not mandate any implementation method - any other method that results in the same N-Triples (RDF graph) may be used.

In particular:

The syntax does not support non-well-formed XML documents, nor documents that otherwise do not have an XML Information Set; for example, that do not conform to XML Namespaces [XML-NS].

The Infoset requires support for XML Base [XML-BASE] which generates information item properties [base URI] below. The use of this property in RDF/XML is discussed in section 5.3

This specification requires an XML Information Set[INFOSET] which supports at least the following information items and properties for RDF/XML:

Document Information Item
[document element], [children], [base URI]
Element Information Item
[local name], [namespace name], [children], [attributes], [parent], [base URI]
Attribute Information Item
[local name], [namespace name], [normalized value]
Character Information Item
[character code]

There is no mapping of the following items to data model events:

Processing Instruction Information Item
Unexpanded Entity Reference Information Item
Comment Information Item
Document Type Declaration Information Item
Unparsed Entity Information Item
Notation Information Item
Namespace Information Item

Other information items and properties have no mapping to syntax data model events.

Open Issue: The handling of XML content inside parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt requires some other Information Items, yet to be determined but based on the requirements for Exclusive XML Canonicalization W3C Candidate Recommendation.

This section is intended to satisfy the requirements for Conformance in the [INFOSET] specification. It specifies the information items and properties that are needed to implement this specification.

6.1 Events

There are six types of event defined in the following subsections. Most events are constructed from an Infoset information item (except for Identifier, Literal and XML Literal). The effect of an event constructor is to create a new event with a unique identity, distinct from all other events. Events have accessor operations on them. and all have the string-value accessor that may be a static value or computed.

6.1.1 Root Event

Constructed from an Document Information Item and takes the following accessors and values.

document-element
Set to the value of document information item property document-element.
children
Set to the value of document information item property [children].
base-uri
Set to the value of document information item property [base URI].
language
Set to the empty string.

6.1.2 Element Event

Constructed from an Element Information Item and takes the following accessors and values:

local-name
Set to the value of element information item property [local name].
namespace-name
Set to the value of element information item property [namespace name].
children
Set to the value of element information item property [children].
base-uri
Set to the value of element information item property [base URI].
attributes

Set to the value of element information item property [attributes].

If the value contains an attribute event xml:lang (that is, the ·local-name· accessor of the attribute has value "lang" and the ·namespace-name· accessor of the attribute has value "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"), it is removed and from the list of attributes and the ·language· accessor is set to the string-value of the attribute.

All other attributes beginning with xml are then removed (that is, all attributes with ·namespace-name· accessors values beginning with "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"). Note: this does not include xml:base which is already present in the Infoset as the ·base-uri· accessor.

URI
Set to the string value of the concatenation of the value of the namespace-name accessor and the value of the local-name accessor.
li-counter
Set to the integer value 1.
bag-li-counter
set to the integer value 1.
language
Set from the ·attributes· as described above. If no value is given from the attributes, the value is set to the value of the language accessor on the parent event (either a Root Event or an Element Event), which may be undefined.
subject
Has no initial value. Takes a value that is an Identifier event. This is used on elements that deal with one node in the RDF graph, this generally being the subject of a statement.

6.1.3 End Element Event

Has no accessors. Marks the end of the containing element in the sequence.

6.1.4 Attribute Event

Constructed from an Attribute Information Item and takes the following accessors and values:

local-name
Set to the value of attribute information item property [local name].
namespace-name
Set to the value of attribute information item property [namespace name].
string-value
set to the value of the attribute information item property [normalized value] as specified by [XML] (if an attribute whose normalized value is a zero-length string, then the string-value is also a zero-length string).
URI
Set to a string value of the concatenation of the value of the ·namespace-name· and the value of the ·local-name· accessor.

6.1.5 Text Event

Constructed from a sequence of one or more consecutive Character Information Items. Has the single accessor:

string-value
Set to the value of the string made from concatenating the [character code] property of each of the character information items. NOTE: This is intended to be identical to how XPath defines this.

6.1.6 Identifier Event

A node for a typed identifier which has the following accessors:

identifier
Takes a string value.
identifier-type
Takes one of the two values "URI" or "bnodeID"
string-value

The value of this is calculated from the other accessors based on the ·identifier-type· value as follows.

When "URI", the value is the concatenation of "<", the value of the ·identifier· accessor and ">"

Otherwise ("bnodeID"), the value is the concatenation of "_:" and the value of the ·identifier· accessor.

These events are constructed by giving two values for the for the ·identifier· and ·identifier-type· accessors.

For further information on identifiers in the RDF graph, see section 5.2.

6.1.7 Literal Event

An event for a text literal which can have the following accessors:

literal-value
Takes a string value.
literal-language
Takes a string value.
literal-datatype
Takes an optional string value used as a URI.
string-value

The value is calculated from the other accessors as follows.

If ·literal-language· is empty then the value is the concatenation of """ (1 double quote), the value of the 2 ·literal-value· accessor and """ (1 double quote).

Otherwise the value is the concatenation of """ (1 double quote), the value of the ·literal-value· accessor ""@" (1 double quote and a '@'), and the value of the ·literal-language· accessor.

If ·literal-datatype· is not empty then append to the value calculated above "^^<" concatenated with the value of the ·literal-datatype· accessor concatenated with ">".

Note that the double-quoted ·literal-value· string must use the N-Triples string escapes for escaping certain characters such as ".

These events are constructed by giving values for the ·literal-value· and ·literal-language· accessors.

Note: Literals beginning with a Unicode combining character are allowed however they may cause interoperability problems. See [CHARMOD] for further information.

6.1.8 XML Literal Event

An event for an XML literal which can have the following accessors:

literal-value
Takes a string value.
literal-language
Takes a string value.
string-value

The value is calculated from the other accessors as follows.

If ·literal-language· is empty then the value is the concatenation of "xml"" ('x', 'm', 'l', and 1 double quote), the value of the ·literal-value· accessor and """ (1 double quote).

Otherwise the value is the concatenation of "xml"" ('x', 'm', 'l', and 1 double quote), the value of the ·literal-value· accessor ""@" (1 double quote and a '@'), and the value of the ·literal-language· accessor.

Note that the double-quoted literal-value string must use the N-Triples string escapes for escaping certain characters such as ".

These events are constructed by giving values for the ·literal-value· and ·literal-language· accessors.

Note: Literals beginning with a Unicode combining character are allowed however they may cause interoperability problems. See [CHARMOD] for further information.

6.2 Information Set Mapping

To transform the Infoset into the sequence of events in document order, each information item is transformed as described above to generate a tree of events with accessors and values. Each element event is then replaced as described below to turn the tree of events into a sequence in document order.

  1. The original element event
  2. The value of the children accessor, a possibly empty ordered list of events.
  3. An end element event

6.3 Grammar Notation

The following notation is used for matching the sequence of events generated as described in Section 6 and describing the actions to perform for the matches. The RDF/XML grammar is defined here in terms of its data model events, using statements of the form:

number event-type event-content

action...

where the event-content is an expression, which may refer to other event-types (as defined in Section 6.1), using constructs of the form given in the following table. The number is used for reference purposes. The action may include generating new triples to the graph, written in N-Triples format.

Notation for matching events and grammar actions.
General Notation
Notation Meaning
event.accessor The value of an event accessor.
rdf:X A URI as defined in section 5.1.
"ABC" A string of characters A, B, C in order.
concat(A, B, ..) A string created by concatenating the terms in order.
Notation for Matching Events
Notation Meaning
A == B A is equal to B.
A != B A is not equal to B.
A | B | ... The A, B, ... terms are alternatives.
A - B The term A but not the term B.
anyURI. Any legal URI.
anyString. Any string.
list(item1, item2, ...); list() An ordered list of events. An empty list.
set(item1, item2, ...); set() An unordered set of events. An empty set.
* Zero or more of preceding term.
? Zero or one of preceding term.
+ One or more of preceding term.
root(acc1 == value1,
    acc2 == value2, ...)
Match a Root Event with accessors.
start-element(acc1 == value1,
    acc2 == value2, ...)
children
end-element()
Match a sequence of Element Event with accessors, a possibly empty list of events as element content and an End Element Event.
attribute(acc1 == value1,
    acc2 == value2, ...)
Match an Attribute Event with accessors.
text() Match a text event.
Notation for Grammar Actions
Notation Meaning
A := B Assigns A the value B.
event.accessor := value Sets an event accessor to the given value.
identifier(identifier := value,
    identifier-type := value, ...)
Create a new Identifier Event.
literal(literal-value := string,
    literal-language := language, ...)
Create a new Literal Event.
xml(literal-value := string,
    literal-language := language, ...)
Create a new XML Literal Event.

7 RDF/XML Grammar

7.1 Grammar summary

7.2.2 syntaxTerms rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:bagID | rdf:parseType | rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype
7.2.3 nodeElementURIs anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:li )
7.2.4 propertyElementURIs anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:Description | rdf:nil)
7.2.5 propertyAttributeURIs anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:Description | rdf:li | rdf:nil)
7.2.6 doc root(document-element == RDF, children == list(RDF))
7.2.7 RDF start-element(URI == rdf:RDF, attributes == set())
nodeElementList
end-element()
7.2.8 nodeElementList ws* (nodeElement ws* )*
7.2.9 nodeElement start-element(URI == nodeElementURIs
    attributes == set((idAttr | nodeIdAttr | aboutAttr )?, bagIdAttr?, propertyAttr*))
propertyEltList
end-element()
7.2.10 ws White space as defined by [XML] definition White Space Rule [3] S in section Common Syntactic Constructs
7.2.11 propertyEltList ws* (propertyElt ws* ) *
7.2.12 propertyElt resourcePropertyElt | literalPropertyElt | parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt | parseTypeResourcePropertyElt | parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt | parseTypeOtherPropertyElt | emptyPropertyElt
7.2.13 resourcePropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?))
ws* nodeElement ws*
end-element()
7.2.14 literalPropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, datatypeAttr?))
text()
end-element()
7.2.15 parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, parseLiteral))
literal
end-element()
7.2.16 parseTypeResourcePropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, parseResource))
propertyEltList
end-element()
7.2.17 parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, parseCollection))
nodeElementList
end-element()
7.2.18 parseTypeOtherPropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, parseOther))
propertyEltList
end-element()
7.2.19 emptyPropertyElt start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ), attributes == set(idAttr?, ( resourceAttr | nodeIdAttr )?, bagIdAttr?, propertyAttr*))
end-element()
7.2.20 idAttr attribute(URI == rdf:ID, string-value == rdf-id)
7.2.21 nodeIdAttr attribute(URI == rdf:nodeID, string-value == rdf-id)
7.2.22 aboutAttr attribute(URI == rdf:about, string-value == URI-reference)
7.2.23 bagIdAttr attribute(URI == rdf:bagID, string-value == rdf-id)
7.2.24 propertyAttr attribute(URI == propertyAttributeURIs, string-value == anyString)
7.2.25 resourceAttr attribute(URI == rdf:resource, string-value == URI-reference)
7.2.26 datatypeAttr attribute(URI == rdf:datatype, string-value == URI-reference)
7.2.27 parseLiteral attribute(URI == rdf:parseType, string-value == "Literal")
7.2.28 parseResource attribute(URI == rdf:parseType, string-value == "Resource")
7.2.29 parseCollection attribute(URI == rdf:parseType, string-value == "Collection")
7.2.30 parseOther attribute(URI == rdf:parseType, string-value == anyString - ("Resource" | "Literal") )
7.2.31 URI-reference An attribute ·string-value· interpreted as a URI reference defined in Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) [URIS] BNF production URI-reference.
7.2.32 literal Any XML element content that is allowed according to [XML] definition Content of Elements Rule [43] content. in section 3.1 Start-Tags, End-Tags, and Empty-Element Tags
7.2.33 rdf-id An attribute ·string-value· matching any legal [XML] token Nmtoken

7.2 Grammar Productions

7.2.1 Grammar start

If the RDF/XML is a standalone XML document (known by having been given the RDF MIME Type) then the grammar starts with Root Event  doc.

If the content is known to be RDF/XML by context, such as when RDF/XML is embedded inside other XML content, then the grammar can either start at Element Event  RDF (only when an element is legal at that point in the XML) or at production nodeElementList (only when element content is legal, since this is a list of elements). For such embedded RDF/XML, the ·base-uri· value on the outermost element must be initialized from the containing XML since no Root Event  will be available. Note that if such embedding occurs, the grammar may be entered several times but no state is expected to be preserved.

7.2.2 Production syntaxTerms

rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:bagID | rdf:parseType | rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype

These are the core terms from the RDF Namespace in section 5.1 that are part of the RDF/XML syntax and never handled as RDF properties or classes.

7.2.3 Production nodeElementURIs

anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:li )

The URIs that are allowed on node elements.

7.2.4 Production propertyElementURIs

anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:Description | rdf:nil)

The URIS that are allowed on property elements.

7.2.5 Production propertyAttributeURIs

anyURI - ( syntaxTerms | rdf:Description | rdf:li | rdf:nil)

The URIs that are allowed on property attributes.

7.2.6 Production doc

root(document-element == RDF,
    children == list(RDF))

7.2.7 Production RDF

start-element(URI == rdf:RDF,
    attributes == set())
nodeElementList
end-element()

7.2.8 Production nodeElementList

ws* (nodeElement ws* )*

7.2.9 Production nodeElement

start-element(URI == nodeElementURIs
    attributes == set((idAttr | nodeIdAttr | aboutAttr )?, bagIdAttr?, propertyAttr*))
propertyEltList
end-element()

For element e, the processing of some of the attributes have to be done before other work such as dealing with children events or other attributes. These can be processed in any order:

If e.subject is empty, generate a local blank node identifier i and n := identifier(identifier := i, identifier-type:="bnodeID"). Then e.subject := n.

The following can then be performed in any order:

If an attribute a with a.URI == rdf:bagID is present, n := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") then in any order:

7.2.10 Production ws

White space as defined by [XML] definition White Space Rule [3] S in section Common Syntactic Constructs

7.2.11 Production propertyEltList

ws* (propertyElt ws* ) *

7.2.12 Production propertyElt

resourcePropertyElt | literalPropertyElt | parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt | parseTypeResourcePropertyElt | parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt | parseTypeOtherPropertyElt | emptyPropertyElt

If element e has e.URI = rdf:li then apply the list expansion rules on element e.parent in section 7.4 to give a new URI u and e.URI := u.

7.2.13 Production resourcePropertyElt

start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ),
    attributes == set(idAttr?))
ws* nodeElement ws*
end-element()

For element e, and the single contained nodeElement n the following statement is added to the graph:

   e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> n.subject.string-value .

If the rdf:ID attribute a is given, the above statement is reified with i := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") using the reification rules in section 7.3 and e.subject := i

7.2.14 Production literalPropertyElt

start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ),
    attributes == set(idAttr?, datatypeAttr?))
text()
end-element()

Note: The empty literal case is defined in production emptyPropertyElt

For element e, and the text event t. If the rdf:datatype attribute d is given then o := literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-language := e.language, literal-datatype := a.string-value) otherwise o := literal(literal-value := t.string-value, literal-language := e.language) and the following statement is added to the graph:

e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> o.string-value .

If the rdf:ID attribute a is given, the above statement is reified with i := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") using the reification rules in section 7.3 and e.subject := i.

7.2.15 Production parseTypeLiteralPropertyElt

start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ),
    attributes == set(idAttr?, parseLiteral))
literal
end-element()

For element e and the literal l, then o := xml(literal-value := l.string-value, literal-language := e.language) and the following statement is added to the graph:

e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> o.string-value .

Test: Empty literal case indicated by test009.rdf and test009.nt

If the rdf:ID attribute a is given, the above statement is reified with i := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") using the reification rules in section 7.3 and e.subject := i.

Open Issue: The result of a literal from rdf:parseType="Literal" content has been generally decided by the RDF Core Working Group but all the cases have not been entirely resolved at this time. The solution will be based on serializing the XML element content in l to a string in a form defined by Exclusive XML Canonicalization W3C Candidate Recommendation.

7.2.16 Production parseTypeResourcePropertyElt

start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ),
    attributes == set(idAttr?, parseResource))
propertyEltList
end-element()

For element e with possibly empty element content c.

Generate a local blank node identifier i and n := identifier(identifier := i, identifier-type:="bnodeID").

Add the following statement to the graph:

e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> n.string-value .

Test: Indicated by test004.rdf and test004.nt

If the rdf:ID attribute a is given, the statement above is reified with i := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") using the reification rules in section 7.3 and e.subject := i.

If the element content c is not an empty, then use event n to create a new sequence of events as follows:

start-element(URI := rdf:Description,
    subject := n,
    attributes := set())
c
end-element()

Then process the resulting sequence using production nodeElement.

7.2.17 Production parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt

start-element(URI == propertyElementURIs ),
    attributes == set(idAttr?, parseCollection))
nodeElementList
end-element()

For element event e with possibly empty nodeElementList l. Set s:=list().

For each element event f in l, generate a local blank node identifier i, n := identifier(identifier := i, identifier-type:="bnodeID") and append n to s to give a sequence of identifier events.

If s is not empty, n is the first event identifier in s and the following statement is added to the graph:

e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> n.string-value .

otherwise the following statement is added to the graph:

e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil> .

If the rdf:ID attribute a is given, the above statement is reified with i := identifier(identifier:=concat(e.base-uri, "#", a.string-value), identifier-type:="URI") using the reification rules in section 7.3.

If s is empty, no further work is performed.

For each identifier event n in s, the following statement is added to the graph:

n.string-value <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#List> .

For each identifier event n in s and the corresponding element event f in l, the following statement is added to the graph: