Re: Editorial proposal for issue 250

I've just *done* both.

Jean-Jacques.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> I'm ok with that. We should also delete the sentence in the "next" role
> 
> "and MAY additionally assume zero or more other SOAP roles."
> 
> As this applies to all of them and people may think it does not when it
> only is called out for "next".
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> 
> 
>>"The ultimate receiver MUST act in this role. "
> 
>