Re: seen cwmclone?

Yes, it is linked from http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html
Oh, I see you added something else too.  Thanks!
Tim

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: seen cwmclone?


> Tim,
> 
> I missed this while we were in france...
> have you seen it?
> 
> 
> CWMClone in SWI-Prolog
> posted by bijan at 2002-02-25 15:56 (+)
> http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2002/02/25/2002-02-25.html#1014652592.304429
> 
> bijan: Alpha release, temporary site ("Cool URIs may not change, but
> geeky URIs change all the time!"0
> bijan: It actually reads and runs a reasonable subset of N3. I have some
> confusions about []/log:forSome, built-ins aren't built, er, in yet. Nor
> does it (yet) support any of cwm.py's cmd line interface. It does have a
> REPL, though. A partial one, at least.
> bijan: It can handle rules12.n3, which isn't too shabby.
> bijan: Performance looks pretty good, thus far. Parsing is a bit slow,
> and using rdf_db.pl to write each result (even when filtering) isn't
> very speedy, but you can construct very fast Prolog queries against the
> n3 store.
> danbri_: Very cool! But have you considered rewriting this in Python?
> bijan: No.
> AaronSw: Sean has something similar in Python, though.
> bijan: Well, GEEZ, TBL has something similar in Python too!
> AaronSw: Silly bijan, his isn't a CLONE!
> bijan: Annoying Aaron, the original is similar to its clones.
> bijan: WOOHOO! Just got a hand-compiled, builtin-using rule to work.
> bijan: Still havn't a clue about existential quantification...
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
> mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 11:58:12 UTC