GUIDO VETERE wrote: > >>Finally, I insist on the need of introducing 'type' vs. 'role' as > modifiers > >>for class declarations. This distinction (that I learned from your works) > >>woud be crucial for for many practical reasons. Have you any comment on > >>that ? > > >Of course we need these things. Type vs. role is certainly a very > >important distinction for an ontology language. > > Fine. We should work on this in the future. Is there room for a proposal in > this direction ? Of course. The webont group is open to suggestions from anybody, in particular people who know what they are talking about, which would qualify the both of you easily:-) You could use me as a channel into the WG, or Guus Schreiber. Thanks for your interest, Frank. ----Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 12:34:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:30 GMT