W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2002

Re: WOLREQS: Draft requirements document

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:56:37 +0100
To: heflin@cse.lehigh.edu
Cc: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu, herman.ter.horst@philips.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, ned.smith@intel.com, connolly@w3.org, hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF10029004.C66F9232-ON41256B38.00034C24@bayer-ag.com>

First of all best wishes for 2002, to all of you!
We haven't really discussed a lot about WOLREQS, sorry for that.
You mention a couple of times "description logic", but I'm still
not enough familiar with that to comment on that.
I think I agree with you w.r.t. explainabilty
(and now I also think that R15. Proof Checking belongs there)
So I agree with your and Deborah's descriptions.

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 19:59:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:04 UTC