Re: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3

If we go that route, then we should also update:

3) Retain all relayable SOAP header blocks that were targeted at 
the forwarding node but ignored during processing.

On a related note, I see you've (Henrik) not yet switched section 
2.7.1 and 2.7.2?

Jean-Jacques.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> HFN writes:
>>>0) Retain all header blocks not targeted at the forwarding node
> 
> Should that be "0) Retain >in order< all header blocks not targeted at the 
> forwarding node?
> 
> I think that might be clearer.