- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:21:24 -0600
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeff Bone <jbone@deepfile.com>, jbone@jump.net, www-archive@w3.org
On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 02:52 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> GET: cat foo >> (or if CGI: ./foo --arg1=val1 --arg2=val2 ...) >> PUT: cat > foo >> DELETE: rm foo >> POST: cat | foo > > If I squint and wave my hands, that works, but looking more closely > this approach constrains foo to be both end-user content and > system-executable content. How so? Something that accepts POST is considered a CGI in the get case: ./foo cat > foo rm foo cat | foo These are all reasonable things to do with system-executable content. -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com]
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 16:21:27 UTC