Re: Editors todo: Issue 227 closed, minor edits done

+1 to both changes, this sounds better.

Jean-Jacques.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Part 1 section 4.2:
>
> <original>
> In cases where multiple features are supported by a binding specification
> the specifications for those features MUST provide any information
> necessary for their successful use in combination. Similarly if a certain
> feature cannot be used if another feature is present this MUST be
> specified.
>
> ; this binding framework does not provide any explicit mechanism for
> ensuring such compatibility of multiple features.
> </original>
>
> note ";" following the period.  I also felt the wording to be a bit lumpy.
>
> <revised>
> In cases where multiple features are supported by a binding specification,
> the specifications for those features MUST provide any information
> necessary for their successful use in combination. Similarly, any
> dependencies of one feature on another (I.e. if successful use of one
> feature depends on use or non-use of another) MUST be specified. This
> binding framework does not provide any explicit mechanism for controlling
> the use of such interdependent features.
> </revised>
>
> Part 2
>
> In 5.1.1 Properties, added comma after "Where appropriate". Without the
> comma the sentence parses ambiguously.
>
> As I say, both of these are checked into the xml versions.  Any problem,
> let me know and we can discuss.  Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------