W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Closing Issue 188: When should xml declarations appear in examples?

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:08:46 +0100
Message-ID: <091501c1e0dc$4a90b8f0$b47ba8c0@zerogravitas>
To: "Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
Just for my clarification, are you saying that the properties *ARE*
carefully described or you want them to be carefully described?

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "XML Protocol Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: Closing Issue 188: When should xml declarations appear in
examples?


> Given that proper use of  the properties in question is carefully
> described in [2], I find this resolution acceptable.  Thank you!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
> 04/10/2002 05:52 PM
>
>
>         To:     "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
>         cc:     "XML Protocol Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
>         Subject:        Closing Issue 188: When should xml declarations
appear in examples?
>
>
> Noah,
>
> The XML Protocol Working Group have closed Issue 188[1] with the following
> resolution:
>
> The attributes found in the XML declaration, namely version, encoding and
> standalone are modelled in the infoset as the [version], [character
> encoding
> scheme] and [standalone] properties of the Document Information Item.
> Having
> XML declarations in examples is thus completely coherent.
>
> I would also note that the latest editor's copy[2] makes explicit
> reference
> to the infoset properties listed above.
>
> If you have any objection to the above resolution it would be helpful for
> the Working Group to receive such feedback as soon as possible.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin Gudgin
> DevelopMentor
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x188
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.xml#soapenv
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 18:07:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:17 GMT