Not to be picky nor to put additional burden on Stuart but I am slightly uncomfortable with the ednote as it stands. I realize that the purpose is to give some flexibility in how we want to move forward. However, it seems to be such a central part of the model that I am wondering whether it would be good to qualify the differences a bit more explicitly so that people don't get the impression that we are completely opening up the floor to suggestions - this was at least not my impression from today's meeting. Could we for example promote Noah's suggestion by providing an alternative piece of text? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com >Sorry to be dumping this all in your in-trays... hopefully a >third and final version. The merging of the two paragraphs >that Henrik noticed required a slight tweak to Noah's ednote >to refer to a single paragraph above rather than two. > >Changes are: merged paragraphs and tweak to the ednote.Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 17:22:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:29 GMT