W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2001

RE: TBTF: In-context Framework Intro.

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@raubacapeu.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:32:36 -0500 (EST)
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: "'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen'" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "'Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com'" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "'Mountain, Highland M'" <highland.m.mountain@intel.com>, "'Chris.Ferris@sun.com'" <Chris.Ferris@sun.com>, "'fallside@us.ibm.com'" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "'hugo@w3.org'" <hugo@w3.org>, "'jones@research.att.com'" <jones@research.att.com>, "'marc.hadley@sun.com'" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "'mnot@akamai.com'" <mnot@akamai.com>, "'ohurley@iona.com'" <ohurley@iona.com>, "'skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.41.0111201728000.17979-100000@tarantula.inria.fr>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Glen Daniels wrote:

>
> In general I think this looks great, though I continue to think the
> "features and MEPs" distinction feels rather artificial.  MEPs are, I
> believe, simply a type of feature, and I'm not sure calling them out as
> something else buys us anything.  Other than that, +1 on the doc.

"ME TOO" ;)
I completely agree with Glen that MEPs are indeed part of the feature list
however, we can perhaps make a difference in the document about classes of
features, like MEP, QoS... both being subclasses of "feature" provided by
the binding.

>
> --Glen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:29 AM
> > To: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com; Mountain, Highland M;
> > Chris.Ferris@sun.com; fallside@us.ibm.com; gdaniels@macromedia.com;
> > hugo@w3.org; jones@research.att.com; marc.hadley@sun.com;
> > mnot@akamai.com; ohurley@iona.com; skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com; ylafon@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: TBTF: In-context Framework Intro.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have continued the editing of Noah's work and here is the result - I
> > think we are getting close! I found a lot of duplication -
> > have cleaned
> > it up somewhat. I have included both the HTML version and the Word
> > version with change bars (don't know how to export them to HTML).
> >
> > Hugo, Yves, rather than sending the whole thing to everybody on
> > xml-dist-app, would it be possible to upload this some place
> > on the W3C
> > site?
> >
> > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> >
> > >I haven't had time to reread all the discussion, but here is a
> > >significant edit to the draft Highland circulated.  I think
> > >it's a good start toward what we agreed on the phone today.
> > >The .HTM and .DOC files are the same content;  choose
> > >whichever is more convenient.  The .gif is unchanged. I'll be
> > >in and out at work tomorrow, then (nominally) on vacation next
> > >week.  Will check for email marked urgent from time to time,
> > >especially Mon-Wed.
> > >
> >
>

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 12:12:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:14 GMT