Re: ETF: updated list of issues related to encoding

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Jacek Kopecky wrote:

>  Hugo,
>  if it's not so, the first set of issues should be listed as
> owned by the ETF. If "editorial" means that editors may go on and
> try to resolve the issues themselves, then you can probably
> reassign the listed editorial issues to ETF as well as we'll
> probably want to see them first. 8-)
>  The last issue is assigned to ETF but IMHO it shouldn't be, the
> ETF hasn't got to that issue yet so I guess it should stay as is
> for now.
>  Thank you,

I modified issues 18, 159, 17, 48,55, 129, 162 to assign them to ETF,
no need to thank me to give you extra work ;)

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."