W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2001

Re: WebOnt Requirements - Summary

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:17:35 -0600
Message-Id: <p05101001b83c77b127f9@[65.212.118.193]>
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: herman.ter.horst@philips.com, dlm@ksl.stanford.edu, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, ned.smith@intel.com, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, www-archive@w3.org

R1 S
R2 S
R3 U  This may be beyond current state of webont art. Needs a deeper 
analysis of meanings of URIs
R4 A  Definitely beyond state of art. Research problem.
R5 S
R5a ?How can we stop it happening? If this means provide coherent 
semantic model for such reasoning, I vote A.
R6 S
R7 S Well, within reason.
R8 U How does this differ from R3??
R9 A Seems peripheral to webont, maybe more of an entire web issue.
R10 S but R10a A
R11 I agree with a and b
R12 A Not central to webont, more of an application area.
R13 S But need to distinguish asking q. about what follows from O, 
and asking q. about structure of O. Subtle but important distinction.
R14 S
R15 S
R 16 U May be beyond current state of art to do this properly.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 22:17:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:15 GMT