On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Crawley <uqscrawl@uq.edu.au> wrote: > I think the answer is "no" to all of Matthew's questions ... unfortunately. > The original Annotea group has wound up. Ralph Swick is still with W3C, > but no longer interested in in Annotea. I had a short conversation with Ivan > Herman a few weeks back (face to face!) and the impression I got was that he > thinks that Annotea is out-dated. Anyway, he said that there was little > chance that the W3C Semantic Web group would reactivate this area. Another > possiblity is /Marja-Riitta Koivunen/ and her "annotea.org" website. > However, the indications are that she is semi-retired at the moment: there > have been no updates to the site since 2006 and she didn't respond to my > email. > > So I think the most practical solution would be to set up an informal > working group (independent of W3C) to come up with consensus answers and > document them. A Wiki-based group sounds a reasonable approach. (We might > be able to host an Annotea Wiki on "http://metadata.net" ... I need to > check out some issues.) > If you need hosting of annotation data then you could use the Talis Platform (I am CTO at Talis). We have a scheme called Talis Connected Commons which gives anyone completely free hosting of public domain data up to 50,000,000 triples. See http://www.talis.com/platform/cc/ for more details. It would be good to see some annotea data being made more public. IanReceived on Monday, 6 July 2009 09:02:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 July 2009 09:02:32 GMT