- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:48:30 -0400
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-annotation@w3.org
At 11:51 AM 8/29/2003 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > - is there any reason why this is not published as a Team submission? > > The annotea system really deserves as much visibility as possible, I > > think :) > I guess it is definetely taking too long by looking the answer :-) >... nothing more concrete than that. I'll bring that up, too. > > > 1. http://www.w3.org/2002/12/AnnoteaProtocol-20021219 We have been planning to do a Note about the first protocol doc version for a long time (and as names changed it would be now a team submission). It is high in our priority list right now. The last thing we need is feedback from you and other Annotea developers on the last questions we have marked in the document. Maybe I should send one question at a time to the list and negotiate what to do. And double check possible earlier comments. We did think carefully about the wordings but, if you can give me exact places where you would prefer that we use stronger keywords that would be helpful. Often it is that the protocol doc might not be the exact right place for the strong requirements (although some are there now), we should have another doc for explaining the implementations. However, finishing what we have now would probably be a good start. We can then add improvements in the next versions. For instance, the finalizing the protocol for shared bookmarks and adding attribution information will be a new version. Also if there are other comments about problems/errors/typos they are welcome. And I would also like to extend the context schema to be able to support SVG outlines for images and time code for video etc. I have also heard that some developers have extended XPointer for addressing video and I would like to here from them. Marja
Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 13:36:14 UTC