W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > January to June 2003

Re: format for body of annotations

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:09:53 -0000
To: www-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <b0pp4l$lp0$1@main.gmane.org>


"Doug Daniels" <rainking@rice.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.33.0301231519310.19069-100000@bunker.ece.rice.edu...

> this sort of annotation 1) has no doctype and 2) has no namespace.  as
> such, when annotest.w3.org serves this document up with mimetype
> "application/xhtml+xml", poor mozilla becomes utterly confused.

annotest gets the mime-type of the resource from the submission, the problem
is purely an Amaya problem of incorrectly submitting the mime-type as
application/xhtml+xml (well and a problem of embedding documents within
other documents in the xhtml world...)

> so, I suggest that we have our clients, especially amaya,  put a namespace
> and/or doctype in the body html.

amaya should simply not claim that the previous document is
application/xhtml+xml when it's not!

Jim.
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:10:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:19 GMT