- From: Nathan Young <nyoung@asis.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:35:58 -0700
- To: www-annotation@w3.org
Hi.
>> We have tested it with Amaya and a forthcoming release of Annozilla. We
>> have tried to to make ZAnnot compatible with the Annotea protocol
>> document as posted...
Is there any documentation about what clients need to be able to expect from
servers (as a minimum)? Or should each server completely implement the
annotea protocol?
Also, is there anything that explains the annotation structure in more detail
than
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#
In particular, I'm not fully sure how I should handle:
<r:Description about="URI">
I think this is because I'm stil learning about RDF. From doing a bit of
reading, my guess is that the URI given should return the full annotation
again?
Also, is there a reason to use one of the body formats over another in a
given situation? are they completely interchangable? Specifically, would
providing the body inline in the response to a query save the client an extra
request?
<a:body r:resource="http://www.example.com/mycomment.html"/>
<a:body>
...
</a:body>
Thanks in advance!
---->Nathan
---
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
---
Nathan Young
N. C. Young Design
(530)629-4176
http://ncyoung.com
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 12:31:48 UTC