W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > July to December 2002

Re: New annotea server in Zope

From: Nathan Young <nyoung@asis.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:35:58 -0700
To: www-annotation@w3.org
Message-Id: <USB8KENMBA82VSJD96QMDPMTQ4WNKXR.3da5ac6e@inky>

Hi.

>> We have tested it with Amaya and a forthcoming release of Annozilla. We
>>   have tried to to make ZAnnot compatible with the Annotea protocol
>> document as posted...

Is there any documentation about what clients need to be able to expect from 
servers (as a minimum)?  Or should each server completely implement the 
annotea protocol?

Also, is there anything that explains the annotation structure in more detail 
than 

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#

In particular, I'm not fully sure how I should handle: 

<r:Description about="URI">

I think this is because I'm stil learning about RDF.  From doing a bit of 
reading, my guess is that the URI given should return the full annotation 
again?

Also, is there a reason to use one of the body formats over another in a 
given situation? are they completely interchangable?  Specifically, would 
providing the body inline in the response to a query save the client an extra 
request?

<a:body r:resource="http://www.example.com/mycomment.html"/>

<a:body>
  ...
</a:body>

Thanks in advance!

---->Nathan


---
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*(([^/]+)/([^/]+)){0,1}/*
---



Nathan Young
N. C. Young Design
(530)629-4176
http://ncyoung.com
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 12:31:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:18 GMT