W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > January to June 2002

Re: storing EARL in annotea

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 14:21:44 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020304135701.02f49130@localhost>
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: <www-annotation@w3.org>
Annotest does work for me as usual with Amaya. So it can be contacted.

Eric is unfortunately travelling for a couple of weeks. He is also trying 
to correct some things reported here. And then the corrections will go 
through a test with a development server other than annotest. But that 
should not take too much time.

Marja

At 03:27 AM 3/4/2002 +0000, Nick Kew wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Jim Ley wrote:
>
> > "Nadia Heninger" <nadia@barbwired.com>
> > > A few warnings from my experience playing with annotea:
> > >
> > > 1. The documentation at
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/User/Protocol.html
> > > is wrong.  Annotest gives errors if you try to just post straight XML
> > to
> > > it.
>
>I'm having that problem now.  It returns HTTP status 404, with a message
>saying "no annotations found" and an HTML page inviting me to formulate
>an algae query.  I've had to stop testing, because annotest now appears
>to be completely uncontactable.
>
> > I have two clients which both post straight XML without problems, the
> > above page is wrong, but only in that it omits the <?xml ... > with that
> > included it works fine for me - what problems do you have?
> >
> > http://jibbering.com/2002/2/annoteaearlnew.rdf is a typical submitted
>
>Not Found
>
> > XML, with:
> >   Content-Type: application/xml
> >   Accept: text/xml
> >   user-agent: FillyJonk IRC Bot
> >   Content-Length: 1000
> >
> > as the headers (content length obviously accurate.)
>
>OK, I've tried with those headers, and a document body that looks fine
>to me from the documentation (and passes the RDF validator).
>
> > > Look at the source for
> > > http://annotest.w3.org/annotations?explain=false for examples of how to
> > > submit things - for example, to submit an annotation you have post your
> > > content as w3c_annotate=<url-encoded rdf>.  Same idea for algae
> > queries.
>
>Can't try that while the server's down.  And if I can do it without
>urlencoding, then that's what I'd prefer.
>
> > This is solved if you use one of the test-servers - I'll leave it to
> > EricP if he wants to open it up to the list.
> >
> > Also I believe it's important we agree on a namespace to use, algae
> > queries really need to know what namespace you are using and it would be
> > nice if we could all use the same one.
>
>I shall ask about this next time I bump into you on IRC.
>
>--
>Nick Kew
>
>Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web.
><URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 14:24:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:17 GMT