Hi, Can someone please tell me why the annotation initiative seems to have skirted XLink and opted for RDF to supply link semantics? Not that there's anything wrong with RDF (of course ;-) but it does seem a little sledgehammer to nut. Or (once again) am I missing something here? Any refs to xlink-annotation material would be appreciated. Cheers, Danny. (I'm afraid the archive search is "Unable to contact target server onatopp.w3.org:11000 after 3 tries."). --- Danny Ayers http://www.isacat.net Alternate email (2001) : danny666@virgilio.it danny_ayers@yahoo.co.ukReceived on Saturday, 17 November 2001 18:57:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:17 GMT