W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > January to June 2001

Re: Photo metadata tool

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:24:31 +0100 (BST)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
cc: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, www-annotation <www-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105171324050.13168-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

thanks.

you can now ;-)

libby

On Thu, 17 May 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> HI, this is pretty cool. Are there interface bits to it so I can search for
> anotations on a particular known image?
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, Libby Miller wrote:
> 
> 
>   Hi charles
> 
>   I had a bit of a go at something like this, because I was so impressed
>   with the RDFPic tool. Instead of embedding RDF in the images however, I
>   stored all the information, including annotations and more fundamental
>   cataloging information in a database. There's a little demo at
> 
>   http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/discovery/2001/03/demos/image.html
> 
>   You can search and annotate the images.
> 
>   I wanted to extend the schema used by RDFPic to include depictions of
>   objects and things in the image, as well as annotations. Danbri's idea
>   was to use terms from wordnet, but I never got around to doing that
>   properly.
> 
>   cheers
> 
>   libby
> 
> 
>   On Wed, 16 May 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
>   > There is an image-editing tool that is used to add RDF metadata, through a
>   > reasonably nice graphic interface, and various other pieces of the stuff,
>   > that go with the Note Describing and retrieving photos using RDF and HTTP
>   > (28 September 2000, Yves Lafon, Bert Bos) - http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/
>   >
>   > A cool tool would be an online interface that did this for images. I copied
>   > Yves on this because he said he thought it could eb done in a day, and he is
>   > the expert in the relevant technology, and I am hoping he can find the day.
>   >
>   > A cool option to add would be the ability to store this as an annotation,
>   > where the server holding the original does not allow the data to be PUT back.
>   > This raises the issue of finding out how to get to a readable version of the
>   > metadata - is this an XML protocol issue or an RDF folks issue or both? (I
>   > don't know - looking for guidance).
>   >
>   > This kind of tool would be extermely useful for identifying images that
>   > people want to use but can't see themselves, among other things. (There was a
>   > recent thread on the topic on the blinux list - unfortunately I can't find it
>   > in the archive yet, but that is at http://leb.net/blinux/blinux-list.html
>   >
>   > cheers
>   >
>   > Chaals
>   >
>   >
>   > --
>   > Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
>   > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
>   > Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
>   > (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
>   >
>   >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
> Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
> (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 08:28:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:17 GMT