W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > January to June 2001

Re: Photo metadata tool

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 05:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, www-annotation <www-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105170556480.14003-100000@tux.w3.org>
HI, this is pretty cool. Are there interface bits to it so I can search for
anotations on a particular known image?

Chaals

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Libby Miller wrote:


  Hi charles

  I had a bit of a go at something like this, because I was so impressed
  with the RDFPic tool. Instead of embedding RDF in the images however, I
  stored all the information, including annotations and more fundamental
  cataloging information in a database. There's a little demo at

  http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/discovery/2001/03/demos/image.html

  You can search and annotate the images.

  I wanted to extend the schema used by RDFPic to include depictions of
  objects and things in the image, as well as annotations. Danbri's idea
  was to use terms from wordnet, but I never got around to doing that
  properly.

  cheers

  libby


  On Wed, 16 May 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

  > There is an image-editing tool that is used to add RDF metadata, through a
  > reasonably nice graphic interface, and various other pieces of the stuff,
  > that go with the Note Describing and retrieving photos using RDF and HTTP
  > (28 September 2000, Yves Lafon, Bert Bos) - http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/
  >
  > A cool tool would be an online interface that did this for images. I copied
  > Yves on this because he said he thought it could eb done in a day, and he is
  > the expert in the relevant technology, and I am hoping he can find the day.
  >
  > A cool option to add would be the ability to store this as an annotation,
  > where the server holding the original does not allow the data to be PUT back.
  > This raises the issue of finding out how to get to a readable version of the
  > metadata - is this an XML protocol issue or an RDF folks issue or both? (I
  > don't know - looking for guidance).
  >
  > This kind of tool would be extermely useful for identifying images that
  > people want to use but can't see themselves, among other things. (There was a
  > recent thread on the topic on the blinux list - unfortunately I can't find it
  > in the archive yet, but that is at http://leb.net/blinux/blinux-list.html
  >
  > cheers
  >
  > Chaals
  >
  >
  > --
  > Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
  > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
  > Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
  > (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
  >
  >


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 05:57:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:17 GMT