Re: vocab proposal: language of annotation (i18n support)

At 06:00 01/05/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:

>(Just a quick note to capture an idea that cropped up over lunch with Marja)
>
>Our XML/RDF annotation vocabularies should capture the language primarily
>used in any textual content within the annotation. For eg., as a
>dc:language property of the annotation.

Would current clients break if we started posting annotations with 
dc:language properties straightaway? Or should we wait until such a usage 
is officially sanctioned?

Matthew Wilson