W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-amaya@w3.org > January to March 2008

Fwd: Most popular invalid documents on www.w3.org (2008-01-24 at 10:56 GMT)

From: Amy van der Hiel <amy@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:29:53 -0500
Message-Id: <DA1FDB28-C49D-4FEC-B22A-51ED32C16E1B@w3.org>
Cc: www-amaya@w3.org
To: Laurent Carcone <carcone@w3.org>

Hi Laurent,

Tim's main page was listed as invalid document and so I was trying to  
fix it.
<http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/  >

The validator rejects the use of rdf, I think.  The DTD was HTML 4.01  
Transitional and I tried changing it to  XHTML 1.0 Transitional but  
still kept getting errors for the RDF, specifically the first  
referrer to foaf.

<rdf:RDF xmlns=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
     xmlns:con=http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#
     xmlns:dc=http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
     xmlns:geo=http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#
     xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
     xmlns:s=http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
         <Person
             rdf:about=http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i  
s:label=Tim
             Berners-Lee>
             <con:homePage rdf:resource=""></con:homePage>
             <made rdf:resource=""></made>
         </Person>
     </rdf:RDF>

I also see that his other page for Kids is also invalid though this  
isn't related to use of rdf, I don't think.
<http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Kids.html>

Can you please advise me as to which DTD I should set as the standard  
when using amaya or what changes you see, if any, which would fix this?

Thanks very much.
Amy


Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: w3t@w3.org
> From: LogValidator <ot+logval@w3.org>
> Date: January 24, 2008 5:56:22 AM EST
> To: w3t@w3.org
> Subject: Most popular invalid documents on www.w3.org (2008-01-24  
> at 10:56 GMT)
>
>
>
> ********************************************************************** 
> **
> Results for module HTMLValidator
> ********************************************************************** 
> **
> Here are the 42 most popular invalid document(s) that I could find  
> in the
> logs for www.w3.org.
>
>  Rank   Hits   #Error(s)                                    Address
> ------ ------ -----------  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----
> 13     352    33          http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 14     304    1500        http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/impl- 
> report-ql
> 42     112    23          http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/
> 139    63     5           http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/
> 161    59     1           http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/events/
> 212    52     1           http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC- 
> xforms-20060314/slice4.html
> 222    52     2           http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/
> 235    51     13          http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/ 
> UseCases/
> 257    48     3           http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet
> 260    48     1           http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/
> 265    47     4           http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/
> 327    41     1           http://www.w3.org/2007/07dc-lhr/
> 340    40     11          http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/../People/../ 
> MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_5.html
> 347    40     1           http://www.w3.org/2008/04dc-pek/
> 360    39     1           http://www.w3.org/2000/Talks/www9-larch/ 
> all.htm
> 364    38     1           http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/misc/vita
> 370    38     1           http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC- 
> xforms-20060314/slice7.html
> 371    38     3           http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/
> 383    37     1           http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3
> 398    36     1           http://www.w3.org/2007/09dc-sou/
> 401    36     7           http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/GUI/
> 405    36     1           http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/
> 418    35     421         http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/tut7/gtut
> 426    35     10          http://www.w3.org/Talks/1999/03/24- 
> stockholm-xhtml/
> 438    35     72          http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/
> 440    34     1           http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC- 
> xforms-20060314/slice8.html
> 443    34     3           http://www.w3.org/History/19921103- 
> hypertext/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html
> 448    34     1           http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/html5-is- 
> html-and-xml.html
> 451    34     1           http://www.w3.org/Talks/1999/05/www8-html/ 
> slide1.html
> 452    34     128         http://www.w3.org/html/planet/
> 454    34     78          http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/drafts/ 
> web-research
> 486    32     4           http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1-Conformance
> 504    31     9           http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/HTML-WG/
> 510    31     1           http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData
> 531    30     3           http://www.w3.org/People/Sandro/
> 532    30     1           http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ 
> UsingZakim
> 553    29     1           http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07
> 556    29     1           http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ 
> TeleconEtiquette
> 559    29     1           http://www.w3.org/2007/08dc-ord/
> 580    28     128         http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Kids
> 589    28     12          http://www.w3.org/2006/11/webinar_de/
> 600    28     10          http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/natural- 
> lang-20030326.html
>
> Conclusion :
> I had to check 600 document(s) in order to find 42 invalid HTML  
> documents.
> This means that about 7% of your most popular documents were invalid.
> ********************************************************************** 
> **
>
>

--
Amy van der Hiel
W3C/MIT
32 Vassar Street, G514
Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
phone: +1.617.253.5628
fax: +1.617.258.5999
amy@w3.org
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 18:30:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:39 UTC