W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-amaya@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: browser vs. editor

From: Irene Vatton <Irene.Vatton@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:44:41 +0200
To: Arlo Leach <arlo@arlomedia.com>
Cc: Amaya users <www-amaya@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1211805881.6251.44.camel@vanuatu.inrialpes.fr>

Le jeudi 22 mai 2008 à 09:30 -0500, Arlo Leach a écrit :
> Hello again,
> 
> I've noticed that a lot of times when Amaya behaves differently than how I
> would expect, it's because Amaya was designed as both a web browser and
> editor, while I'm used to having separate applications for these tasks. For
> example:
> 
> - If I double-click a word that has a link applied to it, I would expect to
> select the word for editing. Instead, Amaya navigates to the link.
> 
> - If I press Tab in a table cell, I would expect my cursor to move to the
> next table cell. Insead, it moves to the next link.
> 
> - If I enter text into a field, I would expect the text to be saved as the
> "value" attribute in the HTML. Instead, my text is lost when I close the
> document.
> 
> I can understand the logic of these behaviors, but at the same time I intend
> to use Amaya only as an editor and never as a browser, so I would prefer it
> to be designed primarily for editing. How does this compare to other users?
> Would the developers consider making the application more editing-oriented
> if that were the consensus of users? Another option would be an explicit
> "edit" and "browse" mode that behaved differently.

It makes sense to have a "pure" editing mode which ignores these
browsing behaviors and SVG animation. I added this request in our todo
list.

> 
> Thanks,
> -Arlo
> 
> _______________________________
> 
> Arlo Leach
> 773.769.6106
> http://arlomedia.com
> 
> Make friends with your computer
> http://compyschool.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Irene Vatton <Irene.Vatton@inria.fr>
INRIA
Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 14:38:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 May 2008 14:38:41 GMT