Hi, I also initially thought that this was a limitation. Now I know better. At this place MathML improves on LaTeX (if you think of <mrow> as being equivalent to "{"). <mo>(</mo> is by default (please see Operator dictionary in MathML Appendix) a growing fence and it grows to the size of its parent which in this case is "<mrow>". There are in fact attributes (stretchy="true|false" fence="true|false") which indicates if it is growing fence or not. The operator dictionary defines the default values for these attributes. Regards S.K.Venkatesan TnQ Books & Journals, Chennai At 02:58 PM 9/13/2004, you wrote: >Am Montag, 13. September 2004 06:12 schrieb Suki Venkat, (TnQ): > > Hi, > > > > <mfenced> has certain limitations, for example, how do you do three as in > > the example: > > > > < A | B > (with say A and B being some sub-expressions). > > > > This is only possible with <mrow> <mo> ..<mo> ..<mo> ..</mrow> construct. > > > > For simple pairs <mfenced> can be used, but it is not very robust. > >Hello, > >if mrow is used, a MathML renderer doesn't necessarily know that the >expression is a paranthesized one. Couldn't this results in wrong rendering? > >WolfgangReceived on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 03:52:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:24:38 GMT