W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-amaya@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Amaya's as Browser Vs Amaya as Coding Tool

From: Frederic G. MARAND <fgm@osinet.fr>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:55:09 +0200
Message-ID: <001501c12ae8$27461c50$c75202c0@kalix.fr>
To: <www-amaya@w3.org>
Amaya's as Browser Vs Amaya as Coding ToolStrictly speaking, frame ARE
present in Amaya. It's just that they're displayed in a way that differs
from your vanilla user-oriented browser...

I'm more worried about Amaya not implementing the DOM and a reference
ECMAscript engine than about frames.

----- Original Message -----
From: Maurizio Codogno
To: www-amaya@w3.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Amaya's as Browser Vs Amaya as Coding Tool
[...]
> As I did a small comparison of it's capability as a browser viewing common
> web sites like "www.msn.com", "www.yahoo.com" and a website we created
with
> FrontPage 2000 for our Intranet. The Results with Amaya viewing "msn" and
> "yahoo" were pretty miserable... with the FP2000 site a great deal better.

Actually, there are some "features" (like frames, if I
remember correctly) which are not present in Amaya by design;
moreover, FrontPage is known to add some "features" on its
own, which are not standard (nothing really strange -
Netscape won over Mosaic for the very same reason...)
[...]
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 04:55:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:24 UTC