W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-amaya@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: NT Question

From: Raquel Rice <raquel@yellowline.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 11:08:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <38AC1CF1.C3A8602D@yellowline.com>
To: www-amaya@w3.org
CC: Ramzi Guetari <Ramzi.Guetari@w3.org>, Irene.Vatton@inrialpes.fr
Ramzi Guetari wrote:

> >In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:12:49 -0500."
> >             <38AA0799.4A930C87@yellowline.com>
> >> I've just found Amaya and am interested in trying it out.  I've
> >> noticed there are two different versions for Windows machines.  My
> >> question is:  Which version will run on NT 3.51?
> >>
> >> Thank you for your help.
> >
> >The WindowsNT version is the most adapted to all Windows NT platforms and
> >we suggest to use Windows95 for all other Windows platforms.
> >If you meet problems let we know.
> >Regards
> >  Irene.
> >
> >

> In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:23:43 +0100."
>                <200002171323.OAA25064@tahiti.inrialpes.fr>
>
>   Any version released is supposed to run on any Win 32 platform.
>   Nevertheless
>   we noticed that if Amaya is built on Windows NT some problems may happen
>   and vice versa.
>
>   The NT version of Amaya is built on 4.0 version and it is not guaranteed
>   that it will work fine on WINNT 3.51. You can try it and tell us about
>   that.
>
>   Irene is right, Win 95 version will work better on NT 3.51 than
>   NT 4.0 version.
>
>
> >  Ramzi.

Thank you Ramzi and Irene, for your help.  I just bought Linux and a new hard
drive, so I may be trying Amaya on both platforms.

--
Raquel
========================================================
It's better to be known by six people for something you're proud of than by 60
million for something you're not.
  -- Albert Brooks

      mailto:raquel@yellowline.com
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2000 11:20:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:21 UTC