W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-amaya@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Problem with amaya v2.2 binary under AIX 4.1.4

From: <Irene.Vatton@inrialpes.fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 13:13:04 +0200
Message-Id: <199910271113.NAA24992@tahiti.inrialpes.fr>
To: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@dlr.de>
cc: www-amaya@w3.org

Hi Jens,

The administator of the AIX box I squat to generate a Amaya version explains me
that the rule is to use X11R6 instead of X11R5.
Nevertheless you are right I had to mention that in the BinDist.html file.
It's done now.

In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 26 Oct 1999 20:29:32 +0200."
             <Pine.A41.3.96.991026201527.25022A-100000@dv.go.dlr.de> 
> Hi,
> 
> executing the pre-compiled binary extracted from amaya-RS6000-2.2.tar.gz
> under AIX 4.1.4 I got the following errors (a similar error with version
> 2.0 was caused by use of X11R6 instead of - old - X11R5 that comes with
> AIX 4.1.4):
> 
>   0509-023 Symbol XtStrin in sh is not defined.
>   0509-023 Symbol XtShell in sh is not defined.
>   0509-023 Symbol coreWid in sh is not defined.
>   0509-023 Symbol XtCvtSt in sh is not defined.
>   (... many similar unresolved symbol errors deleted)
>   0509-023 Symbol XwcText in sh is not define
>   0509-026 System error: Cannot run a file that does not have a valid form
> 
> If the use of X11R6 is done knowingly it should be mentioned somewhere in
> the AIX binary distribution or in the announcement (I hope I haven't
> overseen it). 
> 
> Thanks for Amaya
> 
> Jens
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Jens Schleusener            debis Systemhaus
> phone: +49 (551) 709-2493       Solutions for Research
> fax:   +49 (551) 709-2169       Bunsenstr.10
> mail: Jens.Schleusener@dlr.de   D-37073 Goettingen
> 

  Irene.
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1999 07:13:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:21 UTC