Re: [aapi] RE: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification]

Hi, Cynthia. Sorry for my late reply. If you're still looking for my input,
then notes in UIA column should work well.
Alex.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Alex,
>
> I recall you saying in another context that Firefox was interested in UIA
> Express. The column for it was removed from Core-AAM, and is pretty sparse
> in HTML-AAM. We need to figure out how best to document it.  Most of the
> mappings will be the same as the UIA mappings. What do you think is the
> best way to document the places where it's different? We could add notes to
> the UIA column where needed, or have a separate column where we copy the
> UIA column and add the notes.  I think I'd prefer to have a single column
> if we can, because it will be easier to maintain in the spec. Do you think
> that would work for you? We're not doing any more development on the
> implementation in IE, so you're the main customer right now.
>
> Thanks,
> Cynthia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:20 AM
> To: public-aria@w3.org
> Subject: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing
> UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping
> Specification]
>
> aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. We
> may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification]
>
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1015
>
> Raised by: Cynthia Shelly
> On product: ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification
>
> Firefox has expressed interest in doing UIA Express. We may need to
> un-deprecate it. If we do that, I propose we start by copying the UIA
> column, and then making notes where there is a difference.
>
>
>
>