W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Comment on ARIA 1.0: Problematic conformance requirement for aria-hidden

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:49:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEhSh3e9Ou+k59_Yy3JaB8djywcOpZMZexps26CrhjeTX-LcRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
My 2 cents.

The client-side separation of content and presentation is absolutely
fundamental to the accessibility of the web platform:


That CSS expresses presentation not content is absolutely fundamental
to the design of CSS:


That CSS is used to express the presentation of HTML documents, not
the content of HTML documents, is absolutely fundamental to the
application of CSS to HTML:



There is a fundamental difference between designating some content as
not part of the current state of the application and suggesting some
content may not be necessary to display given a certain presentation
of the current state of the application. That the former implies the
later does not mean that they are the same thing.

@hidden and @aria-hidden were originally intended to indicate state,
while "display" and "visibility" are intended to suggest presentation.
Including information about presentation in the accessibility tree is
useful, conflating it with content is not.

ARIA should allow authors to distinguish the state and presentation,
not force them to conflate them.

Whatever it does, it should not incorrectly cite other specifications.

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 20:50:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:51:46 UTC