- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:57:26 +0200
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, PFWG Public Comments <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Steve Faulkner, Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:01:49 +0100:
> hi Ben,
>>How does this impact what ARIA should say here, in your view?
>
> I think that we should not be adding additional burden and complexity
> for authors with aria-hidden.
>
> aria-hidden confuses me.
>
> I think that html5 hidden and CSS display:none should be functionally
> and semantically the same and that both should imply aria-hidden=true
I think the intention of ARIA's MUST is that authors must/should do
element[aria-hidden=true]{display:none}
rather than
element{display:none}
Do you suggest that ARIA 1.0 should say "SHOULD" instead of "MUST"
w.r.t. aria-hidden="true"?
Leif H Silli
> On 27 April 2012 09:29, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>> Have not been following this discussion closely, but just wanted
>>> to provide info about an implementation detail.
>>>
>>> In all supporting browsers CSS display:none is applied to elements
>>> with the hidden attribute.
>>
>> Thanks Steve.
>>
>> They are following the HTML5 spec in that default styling detail.
>>
>> How does this impact what ARIA should say here, in your view?
Received on Friday, 27 April 2012 13:02:35 UTC