Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Let me enumerate a few possible ways forward. [...] >> >> Option #5 is to accept what currently is in Ian's draft. > > Option #6 is for people to actually respond to my requests for > explanations of the various proposals that people have made, so that I can > actually understand people's positions. As has been demonstrated multiple > times even with the summary="" attribute, when people make reasoned > arguments and demonstrate why their proposals are a good idea, I change > the spec to follow them. +1 - Sam RubyReceived on Sunday, 26 July 2009 11:37:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:49 GMT