- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:04:01 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Hi Ian, >> > Could the WAI respond to my e-mails, such as these?... >> >> I am not a member of WAI. I can not speak for them. > > Now I'm really confused. Is this proposal: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0556.html > > ...not from the WAI then? No. Of course it is not from WAI. I am a member of the HTML Working group; not a member of WAI. It is from the individuals whose names appear at the end of the email. No WAI groups saw or approved or endorsed the proposal. It is a collaborative proposal from concerned individuals. > Who exactly should we be working with, if not > the signatories of that e-mail? WAI's Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) is the primary contact as stated in the HTML WG charter. Ian, if you among all of us HTML Working group members, are confused about who to work with and what is the procedure, no doubt others certainly are too. The proposal is an attempt to clarify and formalize an official HTML WG procedure: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0556.html Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 17:04:43 UTC