W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > July 2009

Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:30:05 -0700
Cc: 'James Graham' <jgraham@opera.com>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'Joshue O Connor' <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Message-id: <B131A869-58E5-4856-A983-1C54EFD1E843@apple.com>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>


On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:27 AM, John Foliot wrote:

>
> Personally I do not understand the harm in keeping summary in the  
> spec as
> conformant, but with guidance that there might be a better way today.

That's exactly what the current spec text does.

  - Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 20:30:52 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Maciej Stachowiak: "Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF"
Previous message: Joshue O Connor: "Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF"
In reply to: John Foliot: "RE: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF"
Next in thread: Ian Hickson: "Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:49 GMT