- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:20:01 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [snip] >> Thus, I think a suggested non-error diagnostic would be better than a >> requirement for a down-played error, in that it would give the advanced >> experts who choose to disregard the warning the opportunity to have >> their content be conforming. > > I've now made the spec do the following except with the third bullet point > replaced with: > > * Made the summary="" attribute conforming but made with a warning from > conformance checkers that the attribute is obsolete. Minor suggestion: change the spec to say "conformance checkers are required to >>>have the ability to<<< warn the user...", i.e. without requiring that this be optional or specifying what the default must be if an option is provided. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 11:20:48 UTC