in that event, it can be ignored, however, one does wonder why the resistance to something so obviously benefitial is so *strong*. On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: Robert J Burns wrote: > I say malicious since the continued repetition of the fallacious > arguments seem directed at ensuring such information is not made > available to visually and cognitively disabled users. The above statement is neither productive nor acceptable. - Sam Ruby -- Jonnie Appleseed with his Hands-On Technolog(eye)s reducing technology's disabilities one byte at a timeReceived on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 15:25:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:47 GMT