On 2/23/09 1:02 PM, John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: > However, the very fact that something must exist will encourage developers > #2 and #3 have 'something' as fallback content. I'm also not sure why #5 is better than #2 or #3. Text that describes the difference might be an interesting read. > The bottom line is that we cannot force anyone to be smart, but we can > construct systems that 'nudge' users in the right direction, Agree. I'll take this to heart in documents I'm working on. > and mandating > some fallback content within the spec does just that. > Mandating is not nudging. Recommending fallback content is a 'nudge'. - RobReceived on Monday, 23 February 2009 18:09:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:47 GMT