W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns

From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:18:55 -0500
Message-ID: <49A23FCF.6020804@mozilla.com>
To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>
CC: 'Geoffrey Sneddon' <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On 2/21/09 1:56 PM, John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote:
> Maybe my suggestion of changing 'should' to 'must' is too simplistic - what
> do I know?  But until such time as this fundamental issue is resolved,
> <canvas>  now has a pall cast upon it that will continue to haunt it.  So fix
> it now, or deal with it later.

Change 'should' to 'must'. Hmm. I we made that change, which of the 
following examples would conform?

1.) <canvas></canvas>

2.) <canvas> </canvas>

3.) <canvas>&nbsp;</canvas>

4.) <canvas>fallback</canvas>

5.) <canvas><section hidden>fallback</section></canvas>

Just wondering.

- Rob
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 06:19:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:16:01 GMT