On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: > > Sam Ruby has now suggested (If I understand what I read) that if folks > want to go off and work on aspects of the current spec out-of the > mainstream, and then return with a better proposal that the WG *should* > be receptive of the work, and not dismiss it out-of-hand. In fact that is the primary way of introducing new features, as discussed in the FAQ: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_the_spec.3F -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 02:20:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:47 GMT