Hi Steve, 2008/9/30 Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>: > 2008/9/30 David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>: >> If it has ARIA in it, then their HTML (by any current W3C recommendation >> that I know of) isn't valid. You can't fix this problem at the tool >> level, you need to address it at the standards level. > > > anybody have any ideas on how we move this forward? Is it a desirable goal? It doesn't resolve the whole issue of ensuring that ARIA is used correctly with a native markup language, but if the ARIA specification is available in a machine readable format (such as what attribute values are valid for a particular attribute, and what attributes can be used with particular roles in RDF), we could build a basic validator to ensure at least the ARIA part is used according to its specification. Cheers, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.comReceived on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 09:26:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:48:44 GMT