W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > May 2008

Re: HTML Action Item 54 - ...draft text for HTML 5 spec to require producers/authors to include @alt on img elements.

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 18:41:06 +0100
Message-ID: <55687cf80805231041u347900fbr8599ae93eea0ab91@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org

hi lachlan
>why should we try to optimise the conformance criteria to be machine checkable

I never stated that it needs to be "machine checkable". what is said
that it needs to be independently checkable.

regards
stevef

2008/5/22 Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>:
> Steven Faulkner wrote:
>>
>> Seems like a good reason to revisit any examples of requirements in the
>> spec and provide requirements that are practical to independently test
>> conformance, rather than make requirements that cannot be tested by anybody
>> other than the author.
>
> Why should we try to optimise the conformance criteria to be machine
> checkable by people other than the author (or those affiliated with the
> author)?  Machines are inherently limited in their ability to check
> documents, so reducing the conformance criteria to be mostly machine
> checkable isn't such a good idea; and optimising for people other than
> authors seems misguided.
>
> --
> Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
> http://lachy.id.au/
> http://www.opera.com/
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 17:41:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:49 GMT