W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Re: [html4all] HTML5 Alternative Text, and Authoring Tools

From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <coordina@sidar.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 02:04:04 +0200
To: "'William Loughborough'" <love26@gorge.net>, <annevk@opera.com>, <connolly@w3.org>, <mattmay@adobe.com>
Cc: <hsivonen@iki.fi>, <public-html@w3.org>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0f4e01c8b48c$dca0dc90$95e295b0$@org>

I only can say: Bravo, William!!

It seem "incredible" to me that we all are discussing this again in 2008!

Maybe the persons that have dudes about alt can read the 1998 discussions to understand all the process and the agreements.

Best regards,
Emmanuelle

-----Mensaje original-----
De: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] En nombre de William Loughborough
Enviado el: martes, 13 de mayo de 2008 1:50
Para: annevk@opera.com; connolly@w3.org; mattmay@adobe.com
CC: hsivonen@iki.fi; public-html@w3.org; wai-xtech@w3.org
Asunto: RE: Re: [html4all] HTML5 Alternative Text, and Authoring Tools


>From    : Anne van Kesteren[mailto:annevk@opera.com]

> I don't really see how this is fair. That there's disagreement over  
certain things related to accessibility doesn't mean that accessibility  
isn't taken seriously. It just means that not everyone is on the same side  
of the table when it comes to that subject.

"that subject"? Is it possible that after a decade of attempts to integrate accessibility into 
design we are still in an us/them configuration?

Accessibility to the Web is the cornerstone of the World Wide Web, not some bolted-on 
characteristic. 

When an attempt is made to sacrifice one of the "poster children" of the effort (the compulsory 
nature of the @alt), it will soon emerge that there are those of us for whom this "child" is as 
important as our own.

No matter how hard one tries to disguise the implicit bigotry in this "war of @alt - now in it's 
second decade - the fact that keeps shining through is that <img> without required @alt is so 
unacceptable as to beggar understanding. 

The position that because there are cases in which its inclusion is inconvenient and deserves 
another round of justification for accessibility's seamless inclusion/integration is patently absurd.

We are all in this together
We are all members of one another
Universal Connection/Accessibility is a Human Right.

Love.
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 00:04:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:49 GMT